Invitation
card of 'Spring Selection' -exhibition, 2009
|
Jukka Siikala is a
truly phenomenal artist from Finland. Especially since jaw-dropping
contributions to the notorious “Anti-Social Realism” artbook,
many people have felt drawn to his images showing sexual brutality
and depravity in a perfectly executed style. It is with honour that I
present this lengthy interview with Siikala in its unabrived form and
the visual content provided by the artist, including exclusive
footage. It is my sincerest belief that Jukka Siikala is one of the
most skilled and noteworthy contemporary creators of art and it has
been a pleasure to hear some of his thoughts!
Jukka Siikala: Sick
fuck, commented some anonymous critic on my blog. Term has a negative
charge, but I sort of like it. Two strong words that have had a great
importance. I was 8 or 9 years old, when my stepfather called me
sick. I had just declared that all people should be killed (I was a
passionate conservationist in those days). Later realizations have
soften my misantrophy and the present hatred is more of a hobby, for
the old times sake. Anyways, the term 'sick' has accompanied me since
and I still identify to it. Sick stands for thinking with open mind.
Fuck, in this context, represent the emotional entity, including a
challenge, call to action.
I have always had a
strong curious drive within me. The thing with curiosity is that it
eventually leads into dark side, towards phenomenas that aren't
clearly visible, towards areas of uncomfort. I'm one of those who
need to turn the rocks over, see the insects and their eggs, taste
the reaction of the body, analyze. My mind is constantly chewing on
something, can be totally pointless, usually is. The paintings that I
do are platforms of my analyses, distilled from life. Over and over
again until there is just the bitter sediment left. Defecated out
from the body. That makes me a happy and healthy fuck.
'Door',
oil on canvas, 62 x 62 cm, 2014 - 2015
|
TM: You seem to have gathered a lot of recognition within Underground
circles, so far. But how about the “real” art world? Do you see
the possibility of making a name for yourself outside of the extreme
underground? Would you like to?
JS: At this point
breakthrough to art world doesn't seem likely to happen. I have made
some gestures to the direction of real art world, but galleries
haven't been interested. My adolescent hostility served with
technical skills and experimental approach to attitude fall into
niche of its own. It is not attractive to adult minded nor to the
ones who dwell in fantasy worlds. But I don't mind really, I have my
small audience.
Leather,
feet and milk, photoshopped model image to assist painting. Under
work.
|
TM: Some of your images are almost photo-realistic. What fascinates you about these exact depictions of reality?
JS: Details and all
that time consuming work gives weight and credibility to my cheap
exploitative subjects that would otherwise be ignored. It feels nice
to have this manipulative power on people's position. Exploitation on
many levels. I also like the information blast created by all those
tiny details. The feeling I achieve is more tense.
Then there is this
sheer stupidity of copying. It is my comment on attempts to personal
style, drama, poetry, originality. I am not judging those attempts. I
am just taking a grip of that level, flashing some self-destructive
sides of power play, just for the sake of it.
Good plain
photorealistic work is impressing, but it lacks dimensions. I prefer
to add some openings with expressionist and surrealist elements.
Play around with the whole paintings style-thing. Build compositional
disharmonies, create contrasts, give balance, give birth.
'You are worth it'
-exhibition. Markkula's video.
|
'Samsung',
oil on canvas, 50 x 70 cm, 2009
|
TM: How do you pick
source material? Is it important for you to have a deeper connection
to it?
JS: There must be an
honest real interest, but the depth of the connection.. not so deep
necessarily. I like shallowness, cheap, provocative.. good
adjectives. Instant feelings, impulsivity. That's what our core is
about. The way of the Rorschach test: vagina, vagina, splattered
blood, vagina.. The depth of a curse: cunt! fuck! My source material
reflects these views. I am not that interested in visualizing the
aspects of 'deeper connection'. They don't serve my needs. Deep is
false, the very idea of depth is misleading.
Lately I have
created my source material by using models. I prefer to have strong
involvement, gain control over subject, feel rooted to the image.
HAVE it. 'It' referring to the image, not the female models. Earlier
I used images from the internet. That was ok, too. Very shallow and
cheap in that easiness. Maybe I go back copying internet images
later, just to erase my attempts of genuinity. Motivations are moving
constantly. Actually this is very rewarding side of painting: the
movements in inner compositions. Doors opening and closing.
Example
of pixellation.
|
TM: Your latest DVD
“Human Porridge” mostly consists of pornographic imagery that you
have visually modified. What is the meaning of your fascination with
pixels, graphic glitches and so on? Do you want to distort reality?
JS: I like the
cruelty of pixellation. The way those errors treat human image. I am
not satisfied with errors that I design by myself. That feels so made
up. I prefer to minimize the level of human touch and use external
sources. Random digital cruelty is a better reflection of nature, of
being, of reality, of my own sadomasochistic characteristics. So the
answer to your question is no, I don't want to distort reality. I
want to catch the feeling of it, the essence, the mechanism.
Ejaculation
on prosciutto, model photo for an upcoming realistic painting in a
classic style, New York, 2015. Thank you M&I.
|
TM: One could easily
imagine that some objects you paint have a symbolic meaning. Is this
the case? Is there any symbol you could (or want to) decipher?
JS: My paintings
have symbolic elements but I am more form oriented than symbol
oriented. It is here in my mind, structure of forms. Within that
structure lies power relations, tension. I try out something on art
work. It fits the structure or it doesn't. It is not up to me to
decide, I just feel it. I have understood that you, the interviewer,
like my works. I suppose our structures fit together in certain
points. There is a connectivity. My paintings are offerings to
people's structures. You can add the paintings to your structure or
if that doesn't feel natural, you can wonder the differences. Or you
can just hate them. I am interested in exploring and cultivating my
structure. Painting is a part of that process. Symbols are just
references to the structure like the whole pornographic thing. There
are colors, composition, ideas, quality. Symbols go under ideas. They
are tools to present ideas in a manner that causes wanted feelings.
In fact, I feel that
you can't create symbols, real symbols. They appear after you have
done your work. They are not under control. The same thing is with
the style. You can't create style. It appears after your work. Not
that I would give importance on style. As an intrinsic value, style
is surficial. There are some symbols that I would like to decipher
like the narrow doorways or windows. You can see them, for example,
in Chirico's paintings. There is something mysteriously haunting in
those forms. Black latex surface, that shining, is it just the form
or is there something more? Drawing connecting lines between objects
gives me satisfaction, there is something hidden in that symbolic
action, I wonder what?
Aokigahara
item
|
TM: Perversion and
sexual fetishes play a huge role in your art. What is your stance
towards the scenes you show? Do they need to be arousing to you? Are
some used simply because they are grotesque and appalling by common
standards?
JS: I'm drawn by
tension and contrast. They are my thing. They can make me really
excited. If there is some feminine envolvement, the feeling turns
easily towards sexual arousal. I'm built that way, total eroticist.
Maybe even a rusty womens bike on a ditch could excite me. The
perversity of this idea.
My art is all about
tension. I don't necessarily need sexual element to create these
power plays, but I tend to use it. Easy portal to biological system.
Itchy manipulation.
Playing with common
standards is cheap. I do that sometimes. It is entertaining. It is
like stepping on sacred art, stepping on principles. But there must
be some other angle, too. Not just grotesque and appalling by common
standards.
Polaroid
from video session with Bizarre Uproar and Elisabeth
|
TM: In the description on your web page, you state that your art is
“flickering between active sadism and indifference of complete
being”. Are these two sides of the same coin for you? In what way
is your art an expression of your own philosophical views?
JS: No, I don't see
them as two sides of the same coin. “Flickering between active
sadism and indifference of complete being” is more like dimension
between no-action and certain kind of action. Combination of humane
factor and state of being. The other side of the coin would be
“flickering between active caring and bubbling of problematic ego”.
That would be maybe some sort of feminist or pacifist art?
My art is not a
straight expression of philosophical views. It is more like an
excrement of those views and there is something growing from that.
Human
porridge', inner cover of the dvd
|
TM: You also did a
show called “My Body is a Slimy Drug” which was shown on the
sixth volume of the Institute of Paraphilia Studies DVD series. What
was the concept behind it?
JS: My friend was
sick of all 'woollen sock'-art in his hometown Tampere. Woollen socks
refers to people that habitate the comfort zone, so to say. So he
suggested that let's do something gross. I made up a simple play:
couple had sex, woman got pregnant and gave a birth, the baby was
destroyed. We were just dwelling in tasteless b-class symbolism,
vulgarity, urine and reindeer blood. Set of tv's showing aborted
fetuses and grannysex. The video was filmed from live show. Making
the whole thing actually took a lot of time and there were several
people involved. We prepared the sounds carefully. My friend taped
screaming women in a bomb shelter, some machinery etc. The actual
video didn't turn out like I wanted. The editor felt bad about all
the images I wanted to add and refused to work on. I had no editing
skills in those times so we left it like it is now.
'You
are worth it' -exhibition. Vernissage activities.
|
TM: Many probably
know you from your involvement in the “Anti-Social Realism”
exhibition and art book. How did this project evolve and how would
you describe your role?
JS: Originally I was
thinking of a solo show, but then I got the idea of asking Aspa and
Markkula to join. We knew each other well and our works fit together.
I was thinking that it would be a real feast of exploitation. I made
up the name of the exhibition 'You are worth it'. Markkula made a
very dirty poster in his Filth and Violence -style. I made another
one: my ejaculation over fullmoon landscape photo. It went wrong, the
sperm shined like a piece of plastic or stearine. I made the
arrangements to rent the gallery. It was more like a space than
gallery. Actually the gallery owner wanted to cancel the whole thing,
when he realized what kind of material we were planning to show. The
son of the owner was on our side. Also one woman who was supposed to
have a show there later that year announced that she will cancel her
time if we can't have ours (still grateful Riina!).
We splitted the
space into three parts and filled the walls. Old style exhibition
with lot of works. Me and Markkula kept gallery open because we lived
in Helsinki. I think there were nearly hundred visitors at the
opening, underground culture people mostly. BU played and dominatrix
humiliated some slave, actually I don't remember if it was he or she.
The transformation process was on. Somewhere in a middle. The somali
visitors from the next-door reggae bar were staring the show in
wonder. Couple guys were drunk enough to sleep on a floor. Very
Finnish style. We had also finishing party with Grunt, another
humiliating show and my video.
'Anti-Social
Realism'-term, the manifestation and the book were Aspa's ideas. Me
and Markkula delivered our images, I designed the covers and Aspa
took care of the rest.
Installation
to be used as a model for painting, 2013
|
JS: We got a very
nice review to a local newspaper, but still, there were not that many
visitors outside noise/PE/black metal-scene. People came in, people
went out, Finns don't tend to chat that much. Besides the gallery
didn't have regular visitors from art circles. It was more like a
room with a light.
The ones who like my
art share their views with me. Others become uneasy and avoid the
topic or laugh. I can only guess what is their perception. Surely
some keep my art morally corrupt while others just treat it as a
childish attempt to shock or as self-flagellation. The most popular
approach is to admire photorealistic side and pass the content with a
smile. Oh, and then there are these people, who simply decide that
this is not art and consequently this opinion becomes the center of
their interest.
In my earlier answer
I mentioned the structure of mind. The people with structural
similarities are drawn to my art. They probably enjoy the world
behind the image, the new links and perceive the painting as a
structural symbol, more or less subconsciously. They enjoy the shared
view. They enjoy this new face of trauma.
Model
photo for future use, Helsinki, 2014
|
TM: What role does
the reaction of the viewer play for you? Do you want to invoke any
feelings in others? Disgust, maybe?
JS: Yes, absolutely.
I am not after certain feelings like disgust, but a set of
contrasting emotions, irritating disharmony glued together with sex,
something ugly that you want to fuck with anxiety.
Painting
for the cover of Nicole12: Black line, 2011
|
TM: You have close
ties to the Power Electronics scene and have done cover art for
projects like Nicole 12, Clandestine Blaze, Antichildleague and
Bizarre Uproar. How does conceptualisation work in these cases? Do
the artists provide you with specific wishes?
JS: I ask detailed instructions, maybe some reference images or vague
ideas of wanted atmosphere. Usually I give some suggestions. Most of
the bands don't really care so much about covers as long as they are
'genrelly correct' so I am not that interested to do covers or create
some recognizable style. There are exceptions like the above
mentioned.
Nicole12 project,
you can't imagine how many teenage images I went through before
finding suitable model for the painting. Endless stream of tipsy
Lilja4evers posing in bleak apartments. I suggested this symbolic
idea of father and herself as a child watching her from the past
through mirror because there was a song about mirror. Or maybe Aspa
suggested. The original reference image Aspa gave me was very funny.
Pair of sad faced stickmen.
Clandestine Blaze
cover.. I got quite clear guides concerning subjects, but the style
was up to me. Well, I took some freedom and hoped for acceptance. It
went well.
BU painting took a
long time to do. If I remember right Markkula just said that it
should be a twisted portrait of his wife. So I surprised him with
this autopsy painting.
I got a very clear
advice to Antichildleague. Rotting penis with a style that I had used
in a cover for Festerday lp.
Photo
session with Elisabeth, Helsinki, 2015
|
TM: You were also
involved in filming the “Dekadenz” clip for Bizarre Uproar. What
was it like and what did you do?
JS: I took the
photos and video clips. Another guy did the editing, added effects
etc. Me and Markkula have a good mutual understanding and overlapping
interests. He gives me free hands. So working with him is a pleasure,
a win-win-situation, very intensive. It is all about exploitation.
Feverish. Our approach is very different though. I am more into
nyances. The women were just great in their roles. The punk girl had
a good nasty attitude and the other woman, she was really into doing
what she did. We had a break from the vomit session and I went to
nearby-shop to grab some refreshments. It felt so weird, suddenly in
a sunshine surrounded by people who wouldn't understand at all what
we had there going on. That is a good feeling. Magic of marginal
ways.
'Phthalocyanine',
oil on canvas, 62 x 62 cm, 2012 - 2015
|
TM: Can you talk
about your working process? Do you make a lot of sketches before
completing the final painting? What kind of materials do you use?
JS: I used to get so
excited over new idea that I started sketching right away. Just some
simple images to get a hold of the idea. It was usually waste of
time. Better let the idea be. Fresh idea, it is fresh, it feels
fresh, there is no patina, no mutations or the mutations are made up.
It takes a long time to develop a real idea, not just on image level.
When it is ready you feel it, but you can't describe it, you can
merely touch it with painted image. That is my sketching, mixture of
feelings and images in my mind. I have no need to sketch it on paper,
it is in my mind, alive.
When the time feels
right I start to work on material level. Recently I have built models
and/or used human models. I take photographs and work with them. I
need a model image that is near the actual image I have in my mind,
something to rely on. I do a lot of seemingly unecessary painting on
details that will be overpainted later, sort of obsessive action. It
feels good. It gives history. It makes the surface full. Over and
over. While I am working the structure appears. Painting sets into
its course and I am more like a person who fullfills the demands
image has. We forget the model and go towards new, the fruit of all
that. One thing is for sure, the painting is never like the one I had
in my mind when I started. It is much.. more with less.
The
Materials of the Artist and Their Use in Painting: With Notes on the
Techniques of the Old Masters by Max Doerner (1949) is my bible
concerning the priming techniques. I use mix of chalk, zinc oxide and
animal glue on a close-knit linen. Lot of layers, lot of polishing,
dammar varnish layers and good quality oil colors. Recently I have
been experimenting with readymade glazing mediums and spray
varnishes. Besided brushes I use finger tips, rugs, sticks etc. Foam
is very practical for making thin colour surfaces.
Illustration
for an upcoming zine, 2013.
|
TM:
What are your plans for the future?
JS: Many exciting
projects lined up. The most acute is the new video for upcoming
minitour with Bizarre Uproar to Russia. Lot of editing work for the
next two months.
Then there is a
split-LP with Grunt that will keep me busy through the spring, I
hope. Grunt deliver the noise, I deliver the visuals as oil paintings
on one side of the vinyls and the buyers deliver the subjects.
Subject being a self taken facial photo. It's going to be affordable
and unique piece of noise culture.
I have also a plan
for a lifesize statue of a woman. It will be demanding and time
consuming work in a spirit of Bellmer. Just have to learn many new
things about making casts and molds.
My novel is almost
ready. I have been writing it for some years, fictional work loaded
with nihilistic thoughts, sex and violence. I am also working on
couple DIY-zines after a long break.
Several porn and
fetish related paintings under work and some new ideas. I had two
photo sessions with a couple in New York. Excited from that material!
What else.. I have a
plan to make a visit to Aokigahara forest again next summer, do
another installation and lot of photographing.
Exhibition –
someday, somewhere..
Polaroid
from video session with Bizarre Uproar and Elisabeth
|
TM: Thanks for the
interview! Any last words, greetings etc.?
JS: Thank you!
Greetings to new friends in New York and old friends in Europe.
For more works by Siikala, including the full-length "Human Porridge" clip and various paintings visit:
JUKKA SIIKALA HOMEPAGE
'Untitled',
oil on canvas, 40 x 54 cm, 2012
|
Untitled |
Untitled |
Experimental Portrait 4 |
Wharf |
White Hardboard |
Where are You Now |
JUKKA SIIKALA HOMEPAGE
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen